Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Marshall · Post by **Marshall** » January 1st, 2009, 1:03 am

I was just thinking, and it seems weird when i think that I've through the whole of the 90's and 2000's !!

Ahhhh, time actually flies seriously fast.

Post by **Soviet** » January 1st, 2009, 1:39 am

definitely worth an entire topic.

The Dude · Post by **The Dude** » January 1st, 2009, 1:51 am

i can remember the 70Â´s,80Â´s,90Â´s and the 2000

some great and some shit periods

Marshall · Post by **Marshall** » January 1st, 2009, 2:05 am

Soviet please shut up, unsociable PRICK.

The Dude wrote:i can remember the 70Â´s,80Â´s,90Â´s and the 2000

some great and some shit periods

Ahhh

Write a book when you're 50

JDogg · Post by **JDogg** » January 1st, 2009, 3:12 am

I don't get your original post Marshal.

Marshall wrote:I was just thinking, and it seems weird when i think that I've through the whole of the 90's and 2000's !!

Put down the alchohol and post again

.

Post by **Soviet** » January 1st, 2009, 9:15 am

Marshall wrote:Soviet please shut up, unsociable PRICK.

I'm not the one insulting people. I was merely commenting on the sadly small amount of material on which to talk. Bascially, it was you stating you've been around close to 20 years and time goes by. Beyond people saying 'I agree, time has passed since I was born' there really isn't much discussion. You gave nothing of any depth and tbh, it is a waste of bandwidth. I have a right to express my opinion (especially when I have come to a logical conclusion) and in this instance I once again stated the logical conclusion I had arrived at. In fact, I'm doing you a favor by giving this thread a direction to go into in the future as otherwise it would be extremely short-lived.

Coontang · Post by **Coontang** » January 1st, 2009, 3:00 pm

It was snappy sarcastic though...

Marshall · Post by **Marshall** » January 1st, 2009, 3:54 pm

jimbojetuk wrote:It was snappy sarcastic though...

Exactly!

Post by **Pedsdude** » January 1st, 2009, 4:29 pm

We haven't gone through all the 2000's...

Coontang · Post by **Coontang** » January 1st, 2009, 4:54 pm

Pedsdude wrote:We haven't gone through all the 2000's...

Peds comes in with a breakthrough argument.

By the way, wouldnt the '2000's mean until 3000?

Marshall · Post by **Marshall** » January 1st, 2009, 5:01 pm

jimbojetuk wrote:
Pedsdude wrote:We haven't gone through all the 2000's...
Peds comes in with a breakthrough argument.

By the way, wouldnt the '2000's mean until 3000?

Oh jeez let's not get the usual CoDJumper ego and start trying to correct everyone.

And yes, the fact that there's one year to go untill 2010.. is exactly what made me think about this.

Neon · Post by **Neon** » January 1st, 2009, 9:06 pm

Before we know it we'll all be on our deathbeds thinking "where has my life gone?"

Post by **Pedsdude** » January 1st, 2009, 9:21 pm

jimbojetuk wrote:By the way, wouldnt the '2000's mean until 3000?

Technically, yes. I believe you'd have to say the 00's, but that's a bit of a pain to say out loud without people wondering what the hell you're on about, so we just don't bother saying anything at all

Marshall · Post by **Marshall** » January 1st, 2009, 9:33 pm

Pedsdude wrote:
jimbojetuk wrote:By the way, wouldnt the '2000's mean until 3000?
Technically, yes. I believe you'd have to say the 00's, but that's a bit of a pain to say out loud without people wondering what the hell you're on about, so we just don't bother saying anything at all

Sorry

Coontang · Post by **Coontang** » January 1st, 2009, 10:04 pm

it wil be wierd, will we call the 2020 era the 20's or the twenty twentys? what will the 1920s be called? It will all sound very wierd...

Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..

Re: Whaaaaaaaaagh..