125 fps need high system requirement?

cod · Post by **cod** » September 13th, 2005, 9:36 pm

cpu intel 2.0
mainboard gigabyte prescott ready
ram 512
graphic card ati 9200

can i get 125 fps if i try?

MuRpHy* · Post by MuRpHy* » September 13th, 2005, 9:38 pm

i believe so . try it out dont ask us

type /com_maxfps 125 into the console. change the resolution if needed, but i would be surprised if it didnt get 125

Neon · Post by **Neon** » September 13th, 2005, 11:30 pm

/cg_drawfps 1 ...... to see what u have

MuRpHy* · Post by MuRpHy* » September 14th, 2005, 1:01 am

hehe i figured he new that one :S /im sorry

Neon · Post by **Neon** » September 14th, 2005, 8:03 am

lol dm

teamwork

Luke · Post by **Luke** » September 14th, 2005, 4:39 pm

well i got a radeon 9600 and i get 125 90% of the time(res 1024 x 768 and highest settings)..so u might struggle with a 9200, depending on what settings u have tho, resolution and other graphics settings too, like murphy said try it out..

Homer · Post by **Homer** » September 14th, 2005, 5:34 pm

Luke wrote:well i got a radeon 9600 and i get 125 90% of the time(res 1024 x 768 and highest settings)..so u might struggle with a 9200, depending on what settings u have tho, resolution and other graphics settings too, like murphy said try it out..

I have a 9600 and i only get 125 when i look down on lowest settings 800x600...

Luke · Post by **Luke** » September 14th, 2005, 5:42 pm

it cant be the card then in your case, assuming u have the settings as mentioned in cod ect, i guess it must be another component thats giving it a bottleneck

MuRpHy* · Post by MuRpHy* » September 14th, 2005, 9:51 pm

yea RAM affects it as well

my friend has 2 gigs of RAM and a 9200 and gets 125 fps looking everywhere :O

=>REG<=Sylence · Post by **=>REG<=Sylence** » September 16th, 2005, 10:08 am

ive a radion 9600 too

,but i ve a 2600 cpu and 1 gig ram it work nice,my wife have an fx 5200 and same cpu but 512 ram and get 100% 125 fps

MuRpHy* · Post by MuRpHy* » September 16th, 2005, 11:31 am

im gettin 512 mb more RAM, and a GeForce FX5500 gcard, the best one atm i can find for a PCI slot. I have read a lot of reviews that its a great card, and it can even run BF2 and Half Life 2 with no probs

Post by **Drofder2004** » September 16th, 2005, 4:40 pm

MuRpHy* wrote: im gettin 512 mb more RAM, and a GeForce FX5500 gcard, the best one atm i can find for a PCI slot. I have read a lot of reviews that its a great card, and it can even run BF2 and Half Life 2 with no probs

FX5500!

DON'T

Like I said before, anything below 5900 is not worth getting. The cards made before the 5900 were made really badly and are pretty shit tbh. If you add a little bit more to your budget, you can get a 5900 or above and be able to get 333

Neon · Post by **Neon** » September 16th, 2005, 5:33 pm

i cant get it to stay @ 333 with the 5900

MuRpHy* · Post by MuRpHy* » September 16th, 2005, 10:00 pm

is that workable for a PCI interface??!! thats all i have

pharcyd3 · Post by **pharcyd3** » September 16th, 2005, 10:35 pm

Drofder2004 wrote:
MuRpHy* wrote: im gettin 512 mb more RAM, and a GeForce FX5500 gcard, the best one atm i can find for a PCI slot. I have read a lot of reviews that its a great card, and it can even run BF2 and Half Life 2 with no probs
FX5500!

DON'T

Like I said before, anything below 5900 is not worth getting. The cards made before the 5900 were made really badly and are pretty shit tbh. If you add a little bit more to your budget, you can get a 5900 or above and be able to get 333

No actually your wrong fx 5500 is not a P of S . I have it and im able to hold 125 constantly and if i look at a wall I can get 333, and my res is 1024 x 768 and my settings are all on Extra , blood on and etc . And even on Half Life 2 I can get 100- fps with all settings on high with 1024 x 768 res. But i have a good comp
Specs are :
64 bit 3400+ amd
1 gig of ram
250 gigs of hard drive
With the fx 5500 256 mb card

So really my comp is good enough to make a 5200 get 125 fps .