Sig MW style.

The graphics forum (images and design) - self explanatory really!

Moderator: Core Staff

Post Reply
User avatar
Frazzer
CJ Worshipper
CJ Worshipper
Posts: 322
Joined: April 13th, 2009, 7:35 pm

Sig MW style.

Post by Frazzer » July 2nd, 2009, 9:26 pm

Bored...
Frazzer.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Image
Top
User avatar
WorldDomoNation
CJ Worshipper
CJ Worshipper
Posts: 376
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:48 pm
Location: Connecticut
Contact:
Contact WorldDomoNation

Re: Sig MW style.

Post by WorldDomoNation » July 2nd, 2009, 9:37 pm

much MUCH better than your Halo one, but it seems pretty big and there's a lot of space under the letters.
that's a nice pic and all, but out of all the pictures you could have taken why'd you take a picture of a plant? :P
-Soviet
Because plants have some really small details. If a plant comes out nice in a photo, you have yourself a good camera ;)
-Drofder 2004
Yes, but if boobs come out really well in a photo you have a picture of boobs :wink:
-Soviet
Discussing Marshall's new camera lol^

Quit Humping And Start Jumping!
Top
User avatar
Frazzer
CJ Worshipper
CJ Worshipper
Posts: 322
Joined: April 13th, 2009, 7:35 pm

Re: Sig MW style.

Post by Frazzer » July 2nd, 2009, 9:41 pm

Yer, this is a test. :p
Image
Top
User avatar
Soviet
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 7762
Joined: April 23rd, 2005, 9:12 pm

Re: Sig MW style.

Post by Soviet » July 2nd, 2009, 10:33 pm

too tall, other than that not bad.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Graphics”