custommap mp_ib_hq

[Drofder2004]

load-freeze-wait-unfreeze

I thought this was what I had, but looking back I have the freeze before the load, which means with either good timing (or a form of lag) this could allow a player to load and bounce.

I will release a modified version later.

[Drofder2004]

I will release a modified version later.

I sense a 3am xfire message.

Doubtful. I am required to be up for work @ 7:30am.
You will either receive the message soon, or you will receive a PM after football!

[x0ozero0x]

Back to the map. I found it quite easy but still quite enjoyable, good map for the newbies. The hidden hq bit is easy to get to lol that pipe looks sooo out of place also there is an elevator to get on top of the map just like the load bounce nonsense, but oh well i had more fun doing the actual map, just a perk for after while your waiting for others to finish i guess

[Infinite]

No, you have misread. In my post where I said you need high ping I haven't mentioned anything about cl_maxpackets 15, in here, you have mentioned it and you said that you need high ping where I said that ping doesn't matter.

But you said in a previous post that it DOES matter, and have said that you do not need cl_maxpackets 15 if you have high ping. I did not misread, but perhaps you do not understand what I wrote.

[Lancast]

Infinite what you on about seriously? You have nothing to go because your wrong and youre gonna keep arguing? I never said high ping doesn't matter when it comes to loadbouncing, in my previous post, the one where I explained how to do loadbounce, it was the technique which requires high ping. In this topic, you have explained the other technique which involves cl_maxpackets 15 and you weren't sure whenever you need high ping or not , I corrected you by saying that you load after you hit the bounce and that ping doesnt matter. Don't state something that is was not involved in my answer to your explanation about loadbounce. What don't you understand? You quoted my explanation how to do loadbounce from another topic where I said you need high ping and quoted post from this topic where I said you don't need high ping(which was a respond to your technique on how to do it), called me a noob because you thought that firstly I said you need high ping and then that you don't, but what you didn't notice was that the technique where I said you need high ping didn't involved cl_maxpackets 15, that's why you misread it. If you did notice that, you woulda never quoted my 2 posts.
Dont bother arguing because you not only misread me but yourself now.

[Drofder2004]

Infinite what you on about seriously? You have nothing to go because your wrong

De Ja Vu!

If you don't respond to a statement which was a statement after your statement means you dont have an answer because you were wrong.

[Lancast]

But that's right to be honest drofer..When 2 people are arguing, giving each other statements, they come to part where 1 person is wrong and the other one is right, if that person thats wrong can't admit that he's wrong he will probably keep arguing with some lies just to go on..Infinite knows that he did misread/misunderstood(I explained why) but he kept going on(and because I said this now, he will probably still keep going on saying that he didn't misread it ignoring my clear explanation why he did)...

[Innkeeper]

Lancast, have you ever considered that you aren't explaining it well enough? People always seem to blame the other person when their's a miscommunication... a miscommunication can't be blamed on any one person because it is an interaction between two people. If someone is not understanding, it is not their fault solely.

[Rezil]

they come to part where 1 person is wrong and the other one is right,

You can both be wrong in the sence that you're even arguing about something as trivial as this.

[Infinite]

Infinite what you on about seriously? You have nothing to go because your wrong and youre gonna keep arguing? I never said high ping doesn't matter when it comes to loadbouncing, in my previous post, the one where I explained how to do loadbounce, it was the technique which requires high ping. In this topic, you have explained the other technique which involves cl_maxpackets 15 and you weren't sure whenever you need high ping or not , I corrected you by saying that you load after you hit the bounce and that ping doesnt matter. Don't state something that is was not involved in my answer to your explanation about loadbounce. What don't you understand? You quoted my explanation how to do loadbounce from another topic where I said you need high ping and quoted post from this topic where I said you don't need high ping(which was a respond to your technique on how to do it), called me a noob because you thought that firstly I said you need high ping and then that you don't, but what you didn't notice was that the technique where I said you need high ping didn't involved cl_maxpackets 15, that's why you misread it. If you did notice that, you woulda never quoted my 2 posts.
Dont bother arguing because you not only misread me but yourself now.

Actually you load right after you bounce and ping doesn't matter : P

Enough said.

I know you have trouble with English, but really? Let your ego go and at least TRY to understand that not everything is what you want it to be (and yes, I know there is irony in that statement). I was JOKING when I called you a noob, and I hoped that the smilie face would help with that, but you clearly ignored it completely. You then went on the make a failed attempt to tell me that I'm wrong, when I'm obviously not because simple facts are just that, facts which are simple. You have completely failed to understand what I have meant when I quoted you. YOU have said in the past that high ping does make a difference to load bouncing REGARDLESS of the method used, therefore it DOES make a difference when load bouncing, yet you have completely ignored that fact, and have raged and attempted to flame me over a forum. I know exactly what you meant by telling me that the two methods are different, but you didn't understand that you incorrectly stated that ping makes no difference at all, and I tried to point that out to you, but you completely ignored it and went for the low road to not understand what I meant, and instead, flamed me for not thinking on a lower level of logic and reasoning. Perhaps I should stop trying to make witty responses when this is the kind of shit I get- being people who make a half-assed attempt to argue with me when they do not try to even see more than one side of a story. Re-read what you wrote and what I wrote and you might actually understand the real logic behind it, but considering that you have not done so so far, I doubt that you will come to a compromise and will rather make another post which attempts to look upon me in a dark lighting.

But that's right to be honest drofer..When 2 people are arguing, giving each other statements, they come to part where 1 person is wrong and the other one is right, if that person thats wrong can't admit that he's wrong he will probably keep arguing with some lies just to go on..Infinite knows that he did misread/misunderstood(I explained why) but he kept going on(and because I said this now, he will probably still keep going on saying that he didn't misread it ignoring my clear explanation why he did)...

What I have said above applies to this post as well.


Also, for future reference, think out what you are writing in your post and what situation you are in before you actually post them. It might save you from looking like a fool.

[Lancast]

See what I mean? He's wrong but he still will keep going on...First of all, why so serious? Grow up and learn how to admit that sometimes youre wrong.

I know you have trouble with English, but really?

Lame excuse for being wrong? You understood perfectly what I said and what I meant.

YOU have said in the past that high ping does make a difference to load bouncing REGARDLESS of the method used, therefore it DOES make a difference when load bouncing

When did I say that? Why make stuff up? I never said that ping does make a difference regardless of which method is used, why make stuff up seriously? I explained once how to do loadbounce using a method with high ping, if I said that regardless of which method I woulda noted that with cl_maxpackets 15 you also need high ping, or with whatever method you need high ping, but I never did, so stop making stuff up.

I know exactly what you meant by telling me that the two methods are different

No you didnt, you misread my posts.

I was JOKING when I called you a noob, and I hoped that the smilie face would help with that, but you clearly ignored it completely.

That was a joke indeed which I understood but the point of that was, you thought that once I said that you need high ping and the other time that I don't which isn't true because you misread.

Infinite, stop making stuff up, learn how to be a man, sometimes you have to admit that you're wrong. If I actually said that regardless of which method is used high ping does matter then you would be right, but I never said it, I never at all said that it matters, all I said that high ping was needed in the explanation I gave on how to loadbounce, however you in this topic explained other method with cl_maxpackets 15 and you werent sure whenever high ping is needed so I corrected you that it isnt. Later, you quoted my post where I said that high ping and on the other post where I said that it isn't needed, so you thought that I don't know what I'm talking about and called me a noob(as a joke of course), but it still points out, that you misread those 2 methods.
After seeing you argue so much when youre wrong, I dont expect you to admit that youre wrong, its natural that you will keep making stuff up and carry on arguing. What I expect that you will do now, is either as I said, make new stuff up and carry on arguing(you will probably regard to the first quote by me on how to do loadbounce and try to lie that I did mean regardless when I didn't), or say something like "Whatever, you're right, I don't care,buzz off now" and end the discussion.
But for now,stop crying please.

Lancast, have you ever considered that you aren't explaining it well enough? People always seem to blame the other person when their's a miscommunication... a miscommunication can't be blamed on any one person because it is an interaction between two people. If someone is not understanding, it is not their fault solely.

I agree, but after my explanations I'm sure Infinite understood what I meant and now he sees that he misread in the first place, however he starts now to make stuff up now, just to keep arguing because he can't admit he misread.

they come to part where 1 person is wrong and the other one is right,

You can both be wrong in the sence that you're even arguing about something as trivial as this.

Ye a bit lame topic to argue about...

[Innkeeper]

See what I mean? He's wrong but he still will keep going on...First of all, why so serious? Grow up and learn how to admit that sometimes youre wrong.

Are you serious? He has provided copious evidence that you don't have a clue what you're talking about. He is angry for your utter disregard of all common sense or respect. From looking at this sequence of posts it is obvious who needs to grow up.

Ye a bit lame topic to argue about...

If you agree... why are you arguing?

How do people not see how stupid they look? Your writing is my only impression of you, you look like a complete fool and an absolute douchebag when you go on like this.

[Soviet]

I'm Soviet, and I approve this topic.

[Rezil]

Take a seat, relax, and have some cake!

[Lancast]

See what I mean? He's wrong but he still will keep going on...First of all, why so serious? Grow up and learn how to admit that sometimes youre wrong.

Are you serious? He has provided copious evidence that you don't have a clue what you're talking about. He is angry for your utter disregard of all common sense or respect. From looking at this sequence of posts it is obvious who needs to grow up.

Ye a bit lame topic to argue about...

If you agree... why are you arguing?

How do people not see how stupid they look? Your writing is my only impression of you, you look like a complete fool and an absolute douchebag when you go on like this.

Are you serious? He provided lies not evidance, I have answered to everything he provided, he made stuff up saying I said 'regardless' when I never did and that changes everything, just because you like him more than me you dont have to lick his ass and protect him. You sir need to learn how to speak for yourself truthfully, if you wanna keep licking Infinite's ass do it somewhere else. I keep arguing because he does when he's obviously misread those 2 methods, you can see it like white on black, if he hasnt misread he wouldnt never quoted those 2 methods. We both look like fools beacuse he keep arguing on such pathetic topic, but he is the real fool because he cant admit he's wrong. Now to keep on arguing he has to make stuff up..

Infinite, you said I flame you over the forum, if you want I can flame you over Xfire on 1on1 conversation, I'd even prefer that, but you won't be such big speaking then, most people are like that, they speak big infront of public only...

BTW: A mod has approved this discussion so piss off